Tabletop Exercises - Test Your Incident Response & Continuity Plans
Tabletop Exercises
Test Your Plans Before You Need Them
Plans look good on paper, but do they work in practice? Tabletop exercises provide a low-risk, cost-effective way to test your incident response, business continuity, and disaster recovery plans, identify gaps, and train your teams.
What is a Tabletop Exercise?
A tabletop exercise is a discussion-based session where team members walk through their roles and responses to a simulated incident or disaster scenario. It's called "tabletop" because participants gather around a table (or virtual meeting) to discuss how they would respond, without actually activating response procedures.
Why Conduct Tabletop Exercises?
Validate Plans - Identify gaps and issues before real incidents occur.
Train Teams - Prepare responders to handle actual emergencies.
Test Procedures - Verify that documented procedures are clear and complete.
Identify Dependencies - Uncover hidden dependencies and coordination needs.
Improve Communication - Practice escalation and stakeholder communication.
Meet Compliance - Satisfy regulatory testing requirements.
Build Confidence - Give teams experience and confidence in their abilities.
Continuous Improvement - Regular exercises drive ongoing plan improvements.
Types of Exercises We Facilitate
Incident Response Tabletops
Scenarios:
- Ransomware attacks
- Data breaches
- Denial of service attacks
- Insider threats
- Phishing campaigns
- Supply chain compromises
- Malware infections
Business Continuity Tabletops
Scenarios:
- Facility unavailability
- Key personnel loss
- Pandemic responses
- Natural disasters
- Supply chain disruptions
- Prolonged power outages
- Civil unrest
Disaster Recovery Tabletops
Scenarios:
- Data center failures
- Cloud service outages
- Catastrophic data loss
- Network failures
- Critical system compromises
- Ransomware encryption
Crisis Management Tabletops
Scenarios:
- Executive-level decision making
- Board and stakeholder communication
- Regulatory notification
- Media management
- Legal coordination
- Multi-scenario cascading events
Our Facilitation Approach
1. Pre-Exercise Planning
- Define exercise objectives
- Select appropriate scenario
- Identify participants
- Review relevant plans and procedures
- Develop inject timeline
- Prepare materials
- Set success criteria
2. Exercise Design
- Create realistic scenario
- Develop progressive injects
- Design decision points
- Create supporting materials (emails, alerts, news reports)
- Prepare evaluation criteria
- Brief facilitators
3. Exercise Execution
- Opening briefing
- Scenario introduction
- Progressive injects
- Facilitated discussion
- Decision documentation
- Issue identification
- Closing discussion
4. Debrief and Analysis
- Hot wash (immediate feedback)
- Strengths identification
- Gap analysis
- Issue prioritization
- Improvement recommendations
- After-action report
5. Follow-Up
- Plan updates
- Training needs identification
- Remediation tracking
- Next exercise planning
Exercise Structures
Discussion-Based (Lower Intensity)
- Walkthrough of procedures
- Role and responsibility clarification
- Informal discussion format
- Lower stress environment
- Best for new plans or teams
Scenario-Driven (Moderate Intensity)
- Realistic incident scenario
- Time-compressed events
- Decision-making required
- Moderately stressful
- Most common format
High-Intensity Simulation (Higher Intensity)
- Real-time scenario unfolding
- Multiple parallel threads
- Media and stakeholder involvement
- High stress and pressure
- Close to actual activation
Typical Exercise Flow
0:00 - Opening (15 min)
- Welcome and objectives
- Ground rules
- Participant introductions
- Scenario overview
0:15 - Initial Inject (15 min)
- Scenario begins
- Initial information provided
- Teams discuss initial response
- Facilitator observes and notes
0:30 - Inject 2 (20 min)
- Situation evolves
- New information provided
- Teams adapt response
- Decision points presented
0:50 - Inject 3 (20 min)
- Complications arise
- Multiple priorities
- Resource constraints
- Communication challenges
1:10 - Final Inject (15 min)
- Scenario resolution
- Final decisions
- Lessons emerge
1:25 - Hot Wash (35 min)
- Immediate feedback
- What went well
- What could improve
- Key issues identified
- Action items captured
Common Discoveries
Documentation Gaps
- Missing procedures
- Unclear responsibilities
- Outdated contact information
- Incomplete recovery steps
Communication Issues
- Unclear escalation paths
- Missing notification procedures
- No templates for common messages
- Stakeholder confusion
Resource Constraints
- Insufficient personnel
- Missing tools or access
- Budget approval delays
- Vendor dependencies
Technical Gaps
- Insufficient monitoring
- Lack of redundancy
- Backup limitations
- Recovery time mismatches
Coordination Challenges
- Overlapping responsibilities
- Missing handoffs
- Cross-team dependencies
- Authority confusion
Deliverables
Exercise Plan
- Scenario and objectives
- Participant list
- Timeline and schedule
- Materials and props
Scenario Injects
- Progressive scenario developments
- Supporting documentation
- Decision points
- Expected responses
Observation Notes
- Real-time observations
- Issue identification
- Strength recognition
- Participant engagement
After-Action Report
- Executive summary
- Exercise objectives and scope
- Scenario description
- Observations and findings
- Strengths and areas for improvement
- Prioritized recommendations
- Action items with owners
Improvement Plan
- Corrective actions
- Responsible parties
- Target dates
- Success metrics
Benefits
Low-Risk Testing - Identify issues without real-world consequences.
Cost-Effective - Much cheaper than full-scale drills or actual incidents.
Time-Efficient - Compress days/weeks of response into hours.
Team Building - Foster collaboration and shared understanding.
Training Value - Experiential learning that sticks.
Plan Improvement - Continuous enhancement of response capabilities.
Compliance - Meet regulatory and framework testing requirements.
Frequency Recommendations
Annual Minimum - At least once per year for each major plan.
After Major Changes - When plans, systems, or teams change significantly.
New Plan Validation - Within 6 months of new plan completion.
Post-Incident - After actual incidents to validate improvements.
Rotating Scenarios - Different scenarios each year for comprehensive coverage.
Who Should Participate?
Incident Response Exercises
- Security team
- IT operations
- Management
- Legal and HR
- Communications
- Relevant business units
Business Continuity Exercises
- Department leadership
- Operations teams
- Facilities and safety
- HR and communications
- Executive sponsor
Disaster Recovery Exercises
- IT operations
- System administrators
- Database administrators
- Network engineers
- IT management
- Business stakeholders
Crisis Management Exercises
- Executive leadership
- Board members (sometimes)
- Legal counsel
- Communications/PR
- Investor relations
Test Your Plans Today
Don't wait for a real incident to discover gaps in your response plans. Schedule a tabletop exercise and build team confidence.
Contact Us to schedule your tabletop exercise.
Related Services